What are the implications for managers of developments in the world trading system? Why should a manager of an international firm care about the political economy of free trade or about the relative merits of arguments for free trade and protectionism?

What are the implications for managers of developments in the world trading system? Why should a manager of an international firm care about the political economy of free trade or about the relative merits of arguments for free trade and protectionism?




  • Trade barriers & firm strategy


Trade barriers constrain a firm's ability to disperse its production activities in multiple locations (which according to trade theories can be highly profitable).

Tariffs raise the cost of exporting → disadvantages to domestic firms.

Quotas limit the ability to serve a country from outside → disadvantage to domestic firms.

Local content regulations could force a firm to locate more production activities in a given market than it otherwise would have → decreasing efficiency and increasing costs since the optimal location for production is not being used.

Threat of anti-dumping action limits the ability to use aggressive pricing to gain market share → disadvantages to domestic firms.


  • Policy implications


Government policies can have a direct impact on business and arise from the need for protectionism against the large influence business firms have on international trade. But as explained earlier, engaging in protectionism might end up with a firm denying themselves the opportunity to build a competitive advantage by constructing a globally dispersed production system. Encouraging protectionism can jeopardize a firm's own activities and sales overseas if other governments decide to retaliate as a response.

What is the development of the world trading system like and the current trade issue?

What is the development of the world trading system like and the current trade issue?



Free trade began in England in 1846, but disappeared with the Great Depression. In 1947, GATT was established to liberalize trade → followed by WTO and more organizations that included enforcement mechanisms and other things to control and regulate trade.

What are the arguments against strategic trade policy? What would happen then if we let government intervene to support domestic firms in order to help them gain first-mover advantages?

What are the arguments against strategic trade policy? What would happen then if we let government intervene to support domestic firms in order to help them gain first-mover advantages?




  • Retaliation and trade war


Establishing domestic firms in a dominant position in a global industry with the help from the government will boost national income at the expense of other countries leading to retaliation(=revenge) and finally a trade war.


  • Domestic policies


Some governments might not act upon the common good of the country, but rather support specific groups with great political influence.

Why do governments sometimes intervene in international trade?

Why do governments sometimes intervene in international trade?



The reasons for governments to intervene in international trade are mostly for political and economic reasons.

- Political reasons.


  1. Protecting jobs and industries
  2. Protecting national security
  3. Protecting consumers
  4. If a product seems to have the ability of endangering its consumers in any way.
  5. Furthering foreign policy objectives
  6. Building good relationships with countries favored by the government.
  7. Protecting human rights


- Economic reasons.


  1. The Infant Industry Argument
  2. Subsidies from the government to give initial support to domestic firms that are trying to establish themselves in an already competitive market. Once they have gained market shares and is functioning well, the subsidies will be removed.
  3. Strategic Trade Policy
  4. Government intervention can be appropriate in order to either help a domestic firm gain first-mover advantage in a global market, or to help domestic firms overcome barriers of late-mover disadvantages.

Which policy instruments are used by governments to influence international trade flows?

Which policy instruments are used by governments to influence international trade flows?



The government has seven specific policy instruments they can use to influence international trade flows.

- Tariffs

A tax or duty that is paid on certain exports and imports.

- Subsidies

Government payment to support domestic producer.

- Import quotas

A direct restriction on the quantity that is allowed to import of a certain product.

- Tariff rate quota

Hybrid of tariff and import quota, meaning they are restricted in quantity and also pay a tariff.

- Voluntary export restraints VER

Usually set up by the exporting country upon request from importing country, which limits the amount allowed to export to the importing country.

- Local content requirements LCR

The decision to require that a certain proportion of a production of a product is done domestically, and the rest can be imported.

- Administrative policies

Rules that make it difficult to enter with import into a country.

- Antidumping policies

Rules on how to handle dumping strategies.

What are cultural exclusives?

What are cultural exclusives?



Cultural exclusives are those customs or behaviour patterns reserved exclusively for the local people, from which the foreigner is excluded.

What is cultural adiaphora?

What is cultural adiaphora?



Cultural adiaphora refers to areas of behaviour or customs that cultural aliens may wish to conform to or participate in.